<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gordaen&#039;s Blog &#187; Ridiculing Stupidity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gordaen.com/category/ridiculing-stupidity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gordaen.com</link>
	<description>Ramblings about art, education, culture and a lot more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Parallel Parking Fail</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/12/15/parallel-parking-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/12/15/parallel-parking-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a few minutes every day, I find myself distracted by the incredibly bad parallel parking I see in Seattle. The image is an example of someone with no spacial awareness, the available space roughly the same size as the car. That didn&#8217;t prevent him (or her) from attempting to park and then proceeding to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.gordaen.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/parallel-parking-fail.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://blog.gordaen.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/parallel-parking-fail-300x225.jpg" alt="Parallel Parking Fail" title="For some reason, I really don't want to parallel park my car near there." width="300" height="225" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-962" /></a></p>
<p>For a few minutes every day, I find myself distracted by the incredibly bad parallel parking I see in Seattle.  The image is an example of someone with no spacial awareness, the available space roughly the same size as the car.  That didn&#8217;t prevent him (or her) from attempting to park and then proceeding to hit both the vehicle in front and behind.  He then pulled out a bit to correct the angle and did it again.  The owner of the car behind came out and banged on the rear quarter panel of the parking vehicle to let the driver know he was about to hit the car again.<span id="more-961"></span></p>
<p>The driver drove off shortly after that, but another car came within thirty seconds to try at the same spot.  Fortunately, this car was 3/4 the size of the previous vehicle.  Unfortunately, the driver still managed to hit both the vehicle in front and the vehicle behind.  If only such hits were a rare occurrence and not a daily one.</p>
<p>At least I have gained new respect for the durability of car paint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/12/15/parallel-parking-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPS Fail</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/11/21/usps-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/11/21/usps-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been meaning to post this picture for a while, but I just finally got around to it today. A letter for Stuart in Florida somehow ended up in my mailbox (I&#8217;m Ian, and I live in Washington State). Our names and addresses are completely different, so I have no idea how it happened. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.gordaen.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/usps-fail.jpg" rel="standard"><img src="http://blog.gordaen.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/usps-fail-300x131.jpg" alt="USPS Fail" title="USPS Fail" width="300" height="131" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-924" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to post this picture for a while, but I just finally got around to it today.  A letter for Stuart in Florida somehow ended up in my mailbox (I&#8217;m Ian, and I live in Washington State).  Our names and addresses are completely different, so I have no idea how it happened.  I think Obama was right when he said, &#8220;It&#8217;s the post office that&#8217;s always having problems.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/11/21/usps-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon Calling Plan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/27/verizon-calling-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/27/verizon-calling-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that every single time I use a webpage with forms in it, something goes wrong. Okay, maybe that&#8217;s a slight exaggeration but not a huge one. This screenshot is from the Verizon site where I was setting up new service. I selected an option for Internet and TV, which was supposed to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/verizon_calling_plan.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/.thumbs/.verizon_calling_plan.png" alt="Verizon site requiring an international calling plan despite that no phone option is selected" title="No thanks?  Nobody tells us 'no thanks'!" /></a></p>
<p>It seems that every single time I use a webpage with forms in it, something goes wrong.  Okay, maybe that&#8217;s a slight exaggeration but not a huge one.  This screenshot is from the Verizon site where I was setting up new service.  I selected an option for Internet and TV, which was supposed to be $50 a month after the &#8220;bundle discount.&#8221;<span id="more-836"></span></p>
<p>When I clicked Next, I got to the screen that expected me to add in a phone service.  I selected no and was promptly warned that not having the phone service disqualifies me for the bundle discount.  Oh, the ol&#8217; bait and switch, I get it.  Fine, next.  What&#8217;s this?  I have to select an international calling plan option despite that I have selected not to add a phone service and there are no other options on the screen (not even an &#8220;I changed my mind, give me phone service&#8221; option)?  Clicking Next just keeps me on the page with the warning.</p>
<p>Congratulations, Verizon, you&#8217;ve made it into my Ridiculing Stupidity category!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/27/verizon-calling-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcohol Plus Guns Equals Fun Times In Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/11/alcohol-plus-guns-equals-fun-times-in-tennessee/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/11/alcohol-plus-guns-equals-fun-times-in-tennessee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you hear the great news? Tennessee&#8217;s House voted to allow people with &#8220;handgun carry permits&#8221; to bring their firearms into bars. This is one of those stories that is simultaneously so hilarious and terrible that you wonder if you can really make it any funnier. I think this is one of those idealistic arguments [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you hear the <em>great</em> news?  <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/08/national/main5001150.shtml">Tennessee&#8217;s House voted to allow people with &#8220;handgun carry permits&#8221; to bring their firearms into bars</a>.  This is one of those stories that is simultaneously so hilarious and terrible that you wonder if you can really make it any funnier.<span id="more-829"></span></p>
<p>I think this is one of those idealistic arguments that ignores reality.  The logic of the argument must be along the lines of the second amendment grants the right to bear arms with a dash of &#8220;innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.&#8221;<sup>*</sup>  Ignoring that courts have already ruled that the rights of individuals can be taken away for the protection of the greater public (e.g., you can&#8217;t yell &#8220;fire&#8221; or &#8220;bomb&#8221; in a crowded theater to exercise your freedom of speech), I still have to wonder about the additional logic.  I&#8217;ve come up with a few possibilities:</p>
<ul>
<li>While incredibly drunk, armed people will exhibit the excellent judgment to not take out their firearms during a fight</li>
<li>When a dangerous situation does break out, the average &#8220;buzzing&#8221; hero will be able to shoot someone else in the face to save everyone (this works <em>especially</em> well with the idea of &#8220;innocent until proven guilty in a court of law&#8221;)</li>
<li>People will be too drunk to be able to even use their guns</li>
<li>The dumb people will begin to eliminate themselves</li>
</ul>
<p>I don&#8217;t know; I must be missing something.  We recognize that intoxication + car = bad, so why not recognize that intoxication + gun = bad?  I hear the argument that people have to get permits to carry guns, blah blah; you have to get a license to drive and yet <em>sober</em> people still cause deadly car accidents every single day.</p>
<p>Besides, as far as I am concerned, the second amendment grants me the right to own a nuclear weapon.  Now I can take my suitcase nuke to the bar with me when I visit Tennessee!</p>
<p><sup>*</sup>Please note that it is okay to not grant this right to people we have not given a trial to but whom we suspect have done bad things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/11/alcohol-plus-guns-equals-fun-times-in-tennessee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/07/windows-vista-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/07/windows-vista-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Asus N50-V notebook that I bought a few weeks ago came with Windows Vista on it. I knew that I&#8217;d dual boot Vista and Ubuntu, but I figured I would just wait the few days before the newest version of Ubuntu came out toward the end of April before installing it. That gave me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Asus N50-V notebook that I bought a few weeks ago came with Windows Vista on it.  I knew that I&#8217;d dual boot Vista and Ubuntu, but I figured I would just wait the few days before the newest version of Ubuntu came out toward the end of April before installing it.  That gave me a chance to explore Vista, since I had thus far managed to avoid it.</p>
<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/windows_customer_experience.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/.thumbs/.windows_customer_experience.jpg" alt="Windows Customer Experience dialog" title="Are you suuuuuuure?" /></a></p>
<p>This was a dialog that came up fairly early on.  It asks, &#8220;Do you want to join the Windows Customer Experience Improvement Program?&#8221; and, as shown in the screenshot, I selected the no option (more positively spun as &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to join the program at this time&#8221;).  Selecting this option disables the OK button.<span id="more-821"></span>  I would think the expected flow would be to have a simple yes/no dialog come up.  You pick your option and select okay.  If you don&#8217;t want to pick an option, you select Cancel.  It appears that you either select Yes and pick OK or select No and click Cancel.  That doesn&#8217;t make sense to me because it&#8217;s requiring two clicks that say the same thing, but I guess that&#8217;s fairly standard Microsoft practice (e.g., the delete confirmation dialog that&#8217;s really just a confirmation of sending it to the recycle bin, which has its own confirmation).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also experienced regular &#8220;unknown&#8221; errors with the Windows Update feature.</p>
<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/windows_update_errors.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/.thumbs/.windows_update_errors.jpg" alt="Windows Update dialog with errors" title="15 failures in one, awesome!" /></a></p>
<p>The first few I encountered were solved by retrying, but now I seem to have attracted error diarrhea, and my logs are filling with errors.</p>
<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/windows_update_error_log.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/.thumbs/.windows_update_error_log.jpg" alt="Windows Update log with errors" title="The success rate is like playing slot machines" /></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I think happened:  I saw that there were 14 new updates to install.  I picked to look at which ones they were and it looked like all MS Office stuff (I have Office 2003 on the notebook), so I clicked to start the update process.  Little did I know, IE8 was snuck in there below the scroll point.  After a few of the Office updates, a dialog box to install IE8 comes up.  I pick to cancel, and now all 14 of the updates show as failed.  Now any time I do updates, those same 14 updates are automatically selected, and I have to manually uncheck them one-by-one.  That&#8217;s right, there&#8217;s no &#8220;Select None&#8221; option.</p>
<p>At least Vista leaves a bit more than two gigs of my four gigs of RAM unused at startup&#8230;. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/07/windows-vista-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Remember My Birthday</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/05/how-i-remember-my-birthday/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/05/how-i-remember-my-birthday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curiously enough, the technique I use to remember my birthday each year is also the one I use to remember which forums I don&#8217;t frequently post at.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/email_birthday_reminders.png" rel="standard"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/.thumbs/.email_birthday_reminders.png" alt="Screenshot of email inbox with multiple birthday reminders" title="Wait a minute, the dates are different!" /></a></p>
<p>Curiously enough, the technique I use to remember my birthday each year is also the one I use to remember which forums I don&#8217;t frequently post at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/05/how-i-remember-my-birthday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Office 2008 Update Error</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-office-2008-update-error/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-office-2008-update-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The error message reads: &#8220;Microsoft Office 2008 Update&#8221; doesn&#8217;t understand the &#171;event sysodisA&#187; message. Well, that makes two of us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/doesnt_understand_message.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/.thumbs/.doesnt_understand_message.png" alt="Screenshot of strange error" title="'Sys-o-dis' could be a song" /></a></p>
<p>The error message reads:<span id="more-813"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Microsoft Office 2008 Update&#8221; doesn&#8217;t understand the &#171;event sysodisA&#187; message.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, that makes two of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/05/05/microsoft-office-2008-update-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Job Spam</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/03/15/job-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/03/15/job-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess there are unwritten rules to the internet that we all somehow know. One of those rules is that spam must contain typos, bad grammar, and other problems that make it very obvious. Corny subjects are a plus but not a requirement. Until recently, I didn&#8217;t realize that semi-targeted spam had to follow the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess there are unwritten rules to the internet that we all somehow know.  One of those rules is that spam must contain typos, bad grammar, and other problems that make it very obvious.  Corny subjects are a plus but not a requirement.  Until recently, I didn&#8217;t realize that semi-targeted spam had to follow the same rules.<span id="more-773"></span></p>
<p>One of the job search sites I registered for allows businesses to send emails, and I&#8217;ve been receiving a few here and there.  Nearly all of them are for commission-based jobs that generally involve selling insurance, though not all.</p>
<blockquote><p>Our website is designed for the processes of selling,buying, exchanging E-bullion, Pecunix,E-gold and other internet money.  All orders completed in 1(one) business day. Our Organization have local branches in Germany,France,Belgium,Finland,Sweden,Austria.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have bank account, We will find nearest bank, and help to open a new bank account there.</p></blockquote>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the form letters that aren&#8217;t filled in:</p>
<blockquote><p>JOB INTERVIEW INVITATION 	 </p>
<p>< $Date$></p>
<p>< $CandidateName$></p>
<p>Through a targeted search, we discovered your resume online. We are interested in talking to you about a career representing the HealthMarkets Companies.</p></blockquote>
<p>Clearly, this is a <em>highly</em> targeted search.  Amazingly enough, they also offer a six-figure income and flexible work hours.  How awesome is that?</p>
<p>And then there are ones like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>We saw your resumé online and would like to speak to you about a career with&#8230;[removed two sentences] Please CLICK HERE and send us a current copy of your resumé</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess the one they saw online was old.</p>
<p>How can there be any economic challenges in this country or others when the business of unsolicited marketing is so booming?  Someone has to half-ass these form letters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/03/15/job-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uncle Sam Does Not Want You!</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/02/26/uncle-sam-does-not-want-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/02/26/uncle-sam-does-not-want-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been looking through a wide variety of government jobs via USA Jobs, and I am noticing trends. Most of the posts are to generate pools for positions that may or may not open. These pools are typically listed for every location on the planet, so, even if you're lucky and a position opens, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been looking through a wide variety of government jobs via <a href="http://www.usajobs.gov/">USA Jobs</a>, and I am noticing trends.  Most of the posts are to generate pools for positions that may or may not open.  These pools are typically listed for every location on the planet, so, even if you're lucky and a position opens, it might be for Minot AFB or some other "less than desirable" location.  Another major problem (that seems most common with the Navy job dump) is that the descriptions are generic and the requirements are too.  I had to do a bit of research just to find out what some of these jobs are really about because I'd rather not apply based on an inaccurate impression (which was good for me, since one of the education-related jobs I was looking at was for working with young children, and that definitely isn't for me).  I found one that sounded particularly interesting, so I thought I would give it a try.  "INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH / OPERATIONS SPECIALIST," sounds cool, right?<span id="more-734"></span></p>
<p>Unfortunately, it's a Navy job that you can't apply for directly through the USA Jobs site, so I went to the Navy site to create an account there and apply.  I submit my details to create an account and...</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80040e31'</p>
<p>Timeout expired</p>
<p>/includes/clsAccount.asp, line 871 </p></blockquote>
<p>Awesome.  I waited a while and got the same thing.  I waited even longer and eventually successfully made an account.  Next step: actually applying.  I put in the job number and click the result.  Then I come to a screen with two chunks of checkboxes.  The first is titled "IA0132" and has choices for "02" and "03."  The second makes more sense and is a ten-mile-long listing of potential job locations.  So I find some that don't start with "IRAQ" and click them.  I go back up to the cryptic "IA0132" and determine that the two boxes are referring to pay grade, so I select both.  I click submit.</p>
<blockquote><p>Please select a pay grade.</p></blockquote>
<p>It's a JavaScript notification.  I disable JavaScript and click submit.  Nothing.  Great, it's a submit button that uses JavaScript (for those who don't know what that means, just groan and say, "Man, who the hell did that?"). I check the source and see a simple chunk of code for the submit button.  Basically, I believe the JS is written for either Internet Explorer or an imaginary browser.  It looks like this:</p>
<div class="igBar"><span id="ljavascript-4"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:showPlainTxt('javascript-4'); return false;">PLAIN TEXT</a></span></div>
<div class="syntax_hilite"><span class="langName">JavaScript:</span>
<div id="javascript-4">
<div class="javascript">
<ol>
<li style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; color: black; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;color:#3A6A8B;">
<div style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: #000066; font-weight: bold;">if</span> <span style="color: #66cc66;">&#40;</span>document.<span style="color: #006600;">forms</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#40;</span><span style="color: #3366CC;">"frmPG"</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#41;</span>.<span style="color: #000066; font-weight: bold;">item</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#40;</span><span style="color: #3366CC;">"chkPyGrd"</span> + d<span style="color: #66cc66;">&#41;</span>.<span style="color: #006600;">checked</span> == <span style="color: #003366; font-weight: bold;">true</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#41;</span> </div>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<p>I believe it should be this (though it's been a while and is rather late, so I might make mistakes too!):</p>
<div class="igBar"><span id="ljavascript-5"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:showPlainTxt('javascript-5'); return false;">PLAIN TEXT</a></span></div>
<div class="syntax_hilite"><span class="langName">JavaScript:</span>
<div id="javascript-5">
<div class="javascript">
<ol>
<li style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; color: black; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;color:#3A6A8B;">
<div style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: #000066; font-weight: bold;">if</span> <span style="color: #66cc66;">&#40;</span>document.<span style="color: #006600;">forms</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#91;</span><span style="color: #3366CC;">"frmPg"</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#93;</span>.<span style="color: #006600;">elements</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#91;</span><span style="color: #3366CC;">"chkPyGrd"</span> + d<span style="color: #66cc66;">&#93;</span>.<span style="color: #006600;">checked</span> == <span style="color: #003366; font-weight: bold;">true</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#41;</span> </div>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<p>No worries though, right?  I mean, they threw it in a try... catch statement, so that any errors would be caught and properly handled.  Check out how the errors are dealt with:</p>
<div class="igBar"><span id="ljavascript-6"><a href="#" onclick="javascript:showPlainTxt('javascript-6'); return false;">PLAIN TEXT</a></span></div>
<div class="syntax_hilite"><span class="langName">JavaScript:</span>
<div id="javascript-6">
<div class="javascript">
<ol>
<li style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; color: black; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;color:#3A6A8B;">
<div style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: #000066; font-weight: bold;">catch</span><span style="color: #66cc66;">&#40;</span>e<span style="color: #66cc66;">&#41;</span></div>
</li>
<li style="font-weight: bold;color:#26536A;">
<div style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; font-weight: normal;">&nbsp; &nbsp; <span style="color: #66cc66;">&#123;</span></div>
</li>
<li style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; color: black; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal;color:#3A6A8B;">
<div style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; font-weight: normal;">&nbsp; &nbsp; <span style="color: #66cc66;">&#125;</span> </div>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<p>Yeah, the errors are ignored.  And this particular error means the form can't be submitted (at least, not in Firefox).  No problem, I'll just manually trigger the script that should be run on success and... it's undefined, yay.</p>
<p>At this point, I am frustrated, so I get a bowl of ice cream to reinforce my determination.  I added a standard submit button.  Success!  Except that I was logged out at this point due to inactivity.  Well, that's what I assume happened.  There was no warning, no notice; I just found myself on the login screen instead of the next page of the application.  I log back in, fill that page out again, add a proper submit button, and submit.  Oh, I don't have a resume on file, so I can't start a job application.  Why didn't they tell me that <em>before</em> I filled out that page?  If I can't fill out a job application without a resume completed, why let me start an application?  It makes no sense!</p>
<p>Not quite at the point of committing seppuku, I start working on a resume.  Don't worry, I won't go into detail about all the problems I encountered there.  I have to end this blog post while my keyboard still works.  I will mention one interesting thing... one of the three required fields for the employment section is the end date.  What do you do if you are still working there?  Leave it blank according to the directions, but it's a required field.  You can't write "present" or anything like that, because it has to be a date in a specific format (I think their server sends some robot assassins at you if you use hyphens instead of slashes).</p>
<p>After all this, I decide I need to get to bed before I start showing signs of my irritation in the way I am filling things out.  I decide to just leave the employment section blank, so I click Save and Exit.</p>
<blockquote><p>No Information provided. If you want to continue working on your resume without completing this section at this time, then click the Skip Step 4 link to skip this section. </p></blockquote>
<p>But <strong>I don't want to continue working on my resume.  I clicked the <em>exit</em> button for a reason!</strong>.</p>
<p>And what was at the end of the journey when I clicked "skip step" a few times?  <a href="https://chart.donhr.navy.mil/myresume/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,">A bad URL with 294 commas in it</a>.  Sadly, I am not kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2009/02/26/uncle-sam-does-not-want-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Need A Fake Degree</title>
		<link>http://blog.gordaen.com/2008/12/10/i-need-a-fake-degree/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.gordaen.com/2008/12/10/i-need-a-fake-degree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing Stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gordaen.com/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've recently discovered that I've been spending a lot of time and money on a college degree that I don't need! You see, nine Washington State Patrol troopers bought fake degrees in order to see pay increases (damn you Gmail for marking economic opportunity as spam!). "The Seattle Times reports the patrol discovered the disputed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've recently discovered that I've been spending a lot of time and money on a college degree that I don't need!  You see, <a href="http://www.bellinghamherald.com/latestheadlines/story/709730.html">nine Washington State Patrol troopers bought fake degrees in order to see pay increases</a> (damn you Gmail for marking economic opportunity as spam!).  "The Seattle Times reports the patrol discovered the disputed diplomas after conducting a routine review of personnel files."  Thank goodness we actually have accountability for a tiny section of government employees....<span id="more-604"></span></p>
<p>But wait, the next line is the one that gets me: "<strong>The nine troopers have been on paid leave since Oct. 13</strong>".  Moral of the story: scam the government by buying a bogus degree and get both a pay increase and a 2+ month paid vacation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.gordaen.com/2008/12/10/i-need-a-fake-degree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

